How city council makes a cop academy
The story of the $95 million police training facility that the mayor, police and other advocates are pushing to build in West Garfield Park is the story of how power works in Chicago. The proposed facility, officially called the Joint Public Safety Training Academy, highlights how the public is often shut out from plans that shape civic priorities and the city itself.
Before the city can break ground on the project, it must pass through City Council, the city’s main legislative body. The council plays a crucial role in the trajectory of large development projects in Chicago, but the process by which projects are approved can be convoluted in ways that limit opportunities for public input and accountability. There are few public hearings and notices about the hearings may not reach all of those who might be impacted. The proposals can also move at a rapid pace that leaves little time for Chicago residents to understand and discuss its implications and ultimately direct their elected officials. Rather than facilitating public participation, the responsibility for tracking a proposal through various council meetings falls on concerned residents.
A coalition of Chicago community organizations, led by Black youth has engaged in the legislative process surrounding the academy by showing up at council meetings, protesting at mayoral events and holding educational meetings about the academy throughout the city. The coalition has used direct action, social media campaigns and popular education to voice public concerns in a process forcibly pushed by the mayor with little critical review from a council that often votes with him.
City Council has already reviewed and voted on portions of the plan to build the academy. Only a few steps remain before the council gives final approval to the academy. Over the coming weeks, council committees and the full council will review and vote on these final pieces.
Continue reading to understand the opportunities council members have to stop, slow down or let through the remaining ordinances that could lead to a new police academy.
But first ...
Who's your alderperson?
Chicago's council members are the officials directly accountable to residents for making big decisions like the police training facility. Enter your address, or that of a place you care about, to find your alderperson. As you read, you will see if they sit on key committees that still have to review portions of the academy plan. You can also see how they've voted on portions of the proposal already reviewed by the council. Spoiler alert: they probably voted to pass the proposal through various stages in the council.
Unlike some decision makers who advocate for or review major city projects, council members are elected - the alderperson in most of the city's 50 wards face challengers on the ballot for the February 26 municipal election.
Who has the power?
Two city council committees, zoning and budget, must review ordinances related to academy before full council votes on those ordinances.
The academy project will come before the zoning committee on February 28 and full council vote could happen as early as March 13. Council members could reject these portions of the project outright or could delay further council action to give more time for council and public review of the $85 million design and build contract.
Plan Commission
On February 21, the commission unanimously approved the development plan for the academy.
The Plan Commission reviews Planned Development projects like the proposed academy. While the commission votes on whether to recommend a particular project, ultimate approval of the project requires a full city council vote.
The commission has 22 members including the mayor, a number of council members, officials from agencies like the Park District and Chicago Transit Authority and 10 members appointed by the major.
Ald. Ed Burke (14th) was a member of the commission until he was forced to step down after being charged with attempted extortion for using his control of zoning and permitting in his ward to direct business to his law firm.
Ward | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | |||
25 | |||
27 | |||
40 | |||
44 | |||
49 |
Zoning
The next meeting is Thursday, February 28, 2019, 11 a.m. at (121 N. LaSalle St.).
The Committee on Zoning, Landmarks and Building Standards must approve an ordinance to change the zoning designation from planned manufacturing district to an institutional planned development.
The zoning change ordinance was introduced by Ald. Emma Mitts (37th). The academy would be built in her ward and she has supported the proposal since before it was publicly announced. In a set of practices known as aldermanic prerogative, council members are given broad control over zoning in their ward. Other council members are reluctant to oppose zoning proposals championed by other alderpeople, even when they have implications for the city as a whole.
Much of the process for approval of large development projects, like the police training facility, are defined in the city's zoning ordinance. The ordinance requires Planned Development review for governmental buildings. For these kinds of development projects, the zoning committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations about a development.
The committee can reject development plans, as it did in June for a proposal to build an apartment building with nearly 300 units near O'Hare Airport. The project raised issues about school overcrowding, density of new development and affordable housing.
The zoning committee was chaired by Ald. Danny Solis (25th) until last month when he stepped down as chairman after announcing in November that he would retire from his council post. Solis was under investigation for corruption which led him to cooperate with federal investigators and secretly record conversations with Ald. Ed Burke (14th). A 2016 federal court affidavit alleged that Solis traded campaign contributions, sex acts, Viagra and other gifts for assistance in reducing business' water bills, steering business to politically-connected law firms and other political influence.
For now, the committee's vice-chair, Ald. James Cappleman (46th), presides over the committee. Activists have staged protests directed at Cappleman over his handling of homelessness and affordable housing in Uptown.
Ward | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | |||
8 | |||
12 | |||
14 | |||
15 | |||
16 | |||
19 | |||
21 | |||
25 | |||
27 | |||
33 | |||
34 | |||
39 | |||
42 | |||
44 | |||
46 | |||
47 |
Budget
The budget committee is responsible for how the city government spends money. They must approve the contract for the design and construction of the facility.
In November 2018, Emanuel announced that AECOM was selected as the firm that would lead the design and construction of the facility. Mayoral candidates and community activists have criticised the mayor for pushing the project forward ahead of the 2019 municipal election. In January, Emanuel introduced the ordinance to approve the contract with AECOM. Ald. Mitts (37th) co-sponsored the ordinance.
AECOM is a global company that reported over $20 billion in revenue in the last fiscal year. The company or its subsidiaries have been involved in some of the city's most visible infrastructure projects including the O'Hare expansion, Loop Link bus service, Millenium Park, highway interchange projects around the city, and the Humboldt Park Beach rehabilitation. AECOM has close ties with city government and employs former city officials, some who left amidst scandals, in high-ranking positions. Moreover, the company has been involved in projects that raised allegations of corruption in the bidding process, overbilling and uncompleted work.
The budget committee previously reviewed a different part of the academy plan. Last May, the committee recommended passing an ordinance that authorized the city to use the proceeds from the sale of two city properties to fund the design and construction of the police training academy. One of the properties was the site of the fleet maintenance facility that was sold to developer Sterling Bay for $104.7 million.
The city also hired AECOM for building projects that are part of new city fleet management facilities in Englewood. These projects were financed by the same land sale that will fund the academy.
The former fleet maintenance facility site is slated to be part of Lincoln Yards, a controversial development project that includes plans for high-rise apartment buildings, retail and entertainment areas and parks. Some council members have moved to oppose the development in part because of the developer's plans to build required affordable units off-site. Some council members and community groups have also voiced concerns about the pace at which the proposal has moved through the council as well as a $900 million TIF that would fund roads, bridges and other infrastructure for the development.
Ward | |||
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | |||
5 | |||
6 | |||
7 | |||
8 | |||
9 | |||
12 | |||
13 | |||
14 | |||
15 | |||
18 | |||
19 | |||
20 | |||
21 | |||
22 | |||
23 | |||
24 | |||
25 | |||
27 | |||
28 | |||
30 | |||
31 | |||
32 | |||
34 | |||
37 | |||
38 | |||
39 | |||
40 | |||
42 | |||
44 | |||
46 | |||
47 | |||
50 |
A final vote
The final vote on whether full council will ultimately vote to approve or reject the contract to design and build the training facility will go to the full council. Last year the council voted, with near-unanimous approval, to pass two ordinances related to the academy.
In November, the council approved one part of the plan: purchasing 30.4 acres of land at 4301 W. Chicago Ave. for the academy. Ald. Carlos Ramirez-Rosa (35th) was the only council member who voted against the purchase.
In May, the council voted to approve funding for the academy. Prior to that vote Ramirez-Rosa and Ald. David Moore (17th) used a procedural rule to delay the vote until the next council meeting. Mayor Emanuel adjourned the meeting and scheduled another council meeting two days later. At that meeting Ramirez-Rosa voted against the spending ordinance and was joined by Ald. Ricardo Muñoz (22nd).
Chicago's city council votes overwhelmingly with the mayor. A 2017 report by former Chicago alderperson Dick Simpson, now a political science professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, found that a majority of council members voted with the mayor in at least 90 percent of council votes, even though the council voted with the mayor less than previous administrations and less the Emanuel's first term . Only nine members voted with the mayor in fewer than 80 percent of the votes.
The next meeting is Wednesday, March 13, 2019, 10 a.m. at City Council Chambers (121 N. LaSalle St.).
Previous Votes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ward | Buy land | Funding | |||
1 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
2 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
3 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
4 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
5 | 👍 | 🤷 | |||
6 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
7 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
8 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
9 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
10 | 👍 | 🤷 | |||
11 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
12 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
13 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
14 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
15 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
16 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
17 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
18 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
19 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
20 | 🤷 | 🤷 | |||
21 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
22 | 👍 | 👎 | |||
23 | |||||
24 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
25 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
26 | 👍 | 🤷 | |||
27 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
28 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
29 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
30 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
31 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
32 | 👍 | 🤷 | |||
33 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
34 | 👍 | 🤷 | |||
35 | 👎 | 👎 | |||
36 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
37 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
38 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
39 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
40 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
41 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
42 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
43 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
44 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
45 | 👍 | 🤷 | |||
46 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
47 | 👍 | 🤷 | |||
48 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
49 | 👍 | 👍 | |||
50 | 👍 | 🤷 |